Go Back   Jeep Garage - Jeep Forum > Jeep Platform Discussion > Grand Cherokee - WK2 - > Engine Performance/Intakes/Exhausts

Join Jeep Garage Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 10-25-2010, 03:41 PM
OneCent's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 1622
OneCent is on a distinguished road
WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

from the Canadian Website

"2011 PERFORMANCE
The all-new 3.6L Pentastar™ V6 engine with Variable Valve Timing Technology (VVT) delivers 290 horsepower and 260 lb. ft torque which is a 38% improvement in hp and an 11% improvement in torque compared to the previous engine. Quiet and refined, it's also more fuel-efficient, offering 8.9L/100 km (32 MPG) Highway, 13.0L/100 km (22 MPG) City and driving range of over 1,000 kilometres - surpassing the outgoing Jeep Grand Cherokee Diesel. This world-class V6 is standard on all models - Laredo, Limited and Overland. "

Why the difference in the mpg to the US? Speed Limits?

Cheers, OneCent
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2010, 03:55 PM
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: brOOklyn
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 2783
JoeSchmoe007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeSchmoe007 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

I don't know where these numbers are from but they seem to be incorrect either way.

Using this calculator:

http://calculator-converter.com/l_10...per_100_km.php

8.9L/100 km = 26.43 MPG
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2010, 03:59 PM
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 383
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 1878
bpmcgee is on a distinguished road
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

Imperial Gallons = 1.2 US gallons
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2010, 04:17 PM
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: brOOklyn
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 2783
JoeSchmoe007 has a reputation beyond reputeJoeSchmoe007 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpmcgee View Post
Imperial Gallons = 1.2 US gallons
Do you mean that Canada uses Imperial Gallons?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-25-2010, 04:35 PM
Red G8R's Avatar
Member
My Jeep: 2011 5.7L WK2
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 907
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 2498
Red G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeSchmoe007 View Post
Do you mean that Canada uses Imperial Gallons?
No...we use metric, so mileage is calculated as litres/100km. When converted to miles/gallon, it works out more because it's done as miles/imperial gallon.
Not sure why it's converted that way. Most younger drivers better understand L/100km over mpg.
I just drove to Montreal on the weekend and highway mileage in EVIC showed 13.4 L/100km. That's not great mileage. So better mileage is a lower number (reverse of yours).
__________________
Peter
2011 GC Overland, 4x4, 5.7L, Q-L, 730N, White/Beige. :thumbsup:
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2010, 05:16 PM
OneCent's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 1622
OneCent is on a distinguished road
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

Thank you for the information. Every day i learn something new ;-).

I agree, 13.6 l/100km is not a great mileage for highway (except for germany ;-).

-> i just saw that you have a 5.7l Hemi, well i think for a 5.7l its not too bad.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2010, 05:30 PM
suzieque's Avatar
Senior Member
My Jeep: 2008 3.0L WK
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,224
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 3176
suzieque is a name known to all
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

thats weird, my EVIC showed 7.7 L/100km on my V6 on a highway trip this past weekend...oh wait, my V6 is a diesel.
__________________
2008 WK "S" Limited bright metallic silver, 5 speed W5J400 transmission, June 18/2008 build, 213RE rear differential with 3.73 axle ratio, 245/60R18 Goodyear Fortera tires, NV245 transfer case, 3.0L CRD.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-25-2010, 07:43 PM
Red G8R's Avatar
Member
My Jeep: 2011 5.7L WK2
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 907
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 2498
Red G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

Quote:
Originally Posted by OneCent View Post
Thank you for the information. Every day i learn something new ;-).

I agree, 13.6 l/100km is not a great mileage for highway (except for germany ;-).

-> i just saw that you have a 5.7l Hemi, well i think for a 5.7l its not too bad.
Correction: after I posted, I checked again and in fact my highway mileage was 11.8 L/100km. I was hoping for better. However, I expect city driving to be only about 18 L/100km.
__________________
Peter
2011 GC Overland, 4x4, 5.7L, Q-L, 730N, White/Beige. :thumbsup:
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-25-2010, 07:43 PM
Technosavant's Avatar
Premium Member
My Jeep: 2011 3.6L WK2
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: STL, MO area
Posts: 1,289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 2928
Technosavant has a reputation beyond reputeTechnosavant has a reputation beyond reputeTechnosavant has a reputation beyond reputeTechnosavant has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

I'd bet the Canadian test cycle is not the same as the EPA test cycle in the US. Run the test differently, the results will change. For example, I'm sure the Canadian test involves putting mayo on the fries while ingesting poutine or somesuch...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-25-2010, 07:45 PM
Red G8R's Avatar
Member
My Jeep: 2011 5.7L WK2
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 907
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 2498
Red G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond reputeRed G8R has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technosavant View Post
I'd bet the Canadian test cycle is not the same as the EPA test cycle in the US. Run the test differently, the results will change. For example, I'm sure the Canadian test involves putting mayo on the fries while ingesting poutine or somesuch...
....nice one. I have no idea how they conduct their mileage test.
__________________
Peter
2011 GC Overland, 4x4, 5.7L, Q-L, 730N, White/Beige. :thumbsup:
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-25-2010, 09:40 PM
White Chocolate's Avatar
Senior Member
My Jeep: 2005 5.7L WK
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 8,336
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 0
White Chocolate is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

Us Canadians have a wierd system I might say lol
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-26-2010, 01:14 PM
Member
My Jeep: 2011 3.6L WK2
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 962
Thanks: 32
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 2978
Cherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond reputeCherodude has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WK2 Canada - why the better mpg?

The Canadian mileage tests are different from the USA tests, and are likely too optimistic for highway mileage, even taking the Imperial gallon factor (=1.2 US gallons) into account.

I think the EVIC readings should also be taken with a grain of salt. Anyone have true tank fill to tank fill mileage for 100% pure Interstate or equal highway driving by hand calculator? If so, please state your engine size.

Thanks in advance.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mpg :) downstate Grand Cherokee SRT8 - WK 17 03-18-2011 08:33 PM
04 wj mpg mrjaydeeone Engine Performance/Intake/Exhaust 32 07-30-2010 06:30 PM
4.0 terrible mpg 2000 Grand Engine Performance/Intake/Exhaust 12 03-24-2010 09:37 AM
Is this 4.7L MPG really something I have to get use to??? nastylil93 Grand Cherokee - WK 104 02-24-2010 01:25 AM
4.8 mpg 06SRT8300C Troubleshooting/Problems Discussion 26 07-03-2009 12:09 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2012 - JeepGarage.Org
The Jeep Grand Cherokee Owners Community

JeepGarage.org is in no way associated with or endorsed by Chrysler Group LLC.