Jeep Garage  - Jeep Forum banner

2011 Grand Cherokee Vid

5K views 16 replies 11 participants last post by  Scottina06 
#1 ·
#3 ·
The rear is still horrible to me. Interior looks very nice. Notice he calls it a crossover? It ain't what it used to be and to me that ain't good.:confused::(
 
#8 ·
X2!!
 
#6 ·
IMO...for what its worth....he says "Luxury crossover SUV" IMO...he means the new WK crosses over into the luxury segment of the SUV competetion. Its def. not a crossover SUV...ie. lexus, murano etc. etc.
 
#9 ·
you guys think this rearend is ugly but dont think the base 05-09 WK rearend isnt ugly? The base 05-09 wk rear facia is a joke...IMO
 
#10 ·
I look at it this way. Remember back in early 04 when there were spy shots and then in April of 04 the WK 1.0 was revealed? And everyone said I will never trade my WJ in for that ugly POS! Look at what a majority of former WJ owners are driving now.


Enough said.

Amen.
 
#16 ·
Remember that all too well. Many were comparing the "new" 05 WK design to a Chev Equinox or some other emasculated SUV or crossover. I think no matter what the designers had come up with for a rear end design, someone would find reason to criticize.
You can please some of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time.

A former MJ/XJ/ZJ/WJ owner.
 
#11 ·
Again, I agree with Scott! lol
I find the later WK's particularly repulsive, and I'm thankful mine has facory fogs to break it up.
I remember seeing pictures before it's release of the WK, and actually LOL'ing at how ugly it was. Availability of a hemi turned me though :p
To my eyes, WK 2.0 is MUCH classier all over.
 
#12 ·
we shoulda asked the engineer that was on here nopt tlong ago about the reason for the extra reflectors on the lift gate. I see all the new SUV's with them. Is it a govt. crash requirement or something now ya think?
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top