Car & Driver article on the V6 says no DI for MY16 - Jeep Garage - Jeep Forum

Go Back   Jeep Garage - Jeep Forum > Jeep Platform Discussion > Grand Cherokee - WK2 -

Join Jeep Garage Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 09-01-2015, 05:45 PM
Houghton Lake,MI.'s Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Houghton Lake, MI.
Posts: 64
Thanks: 22
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 689
Houghton Lake,MI. is on a distinguished road
Car & Driver article on the V6 says no DI for MY16

I thought the updates stated it would for MY 16. All in all it still looks like the V6 is getting some upgrades.
I may have had read the list wrong in the beginning.
No worries ,Chrysler Reveals Major Revisions to Pentastar V-6 – News – Car and Driver | Car and Driver Blog

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 09-01-2015, 09:01 PM
MDBones's Avatar
OVERLAND HIGH ALTITUDE
My Jeep: 2016 3.6L WK2
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Wisconsin's West Coast
Posts: 3,554
Thanks: 621
Thanked 607 Times in 499 Posts
Rep Power: 10528
MDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond reputeMDBones has a reputation beyond repute
Garage
Re: Car & Driver article on the V6 says no DI for MY16

That will make some people happy.
__________________

THE GHOST
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2015, 10:07 PM
Technosavant's Avatar
Premium Member
My Jeep: 2011 3.6L WK2
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: STL, MO area
Posts: 1,301
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 3711
Technosavant has a reputation beyond reputeTechnosavant has a reputation beyond reputeTechnosavant has a reputation beyond reputeTechnosavant has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Car & Driver article on the V6 says no DI for MY16

DI cuts both ways. On one hand you have slightly better efficiency and power because of better control of the spray, on the other you have to come up with a way to deal with the carbon on the valves or resign yourself to regular cleaning bills. One automaker (I forget who) kept using injectors in the regular location with DI engines... a little shot of fuel from the port injectors every so often kept things clean. Or so I heard.

IMO, if the torque band can get broadened it will be a huge help. 260 lb-ft. only appearing at over 4000RPM was a major oversight for a vehicle like this. Mated to the Mercedes W5A580 transmission (2011-2012) it really meant the thing can be caught flat-footed pretty easily. The 8 speed really helped with this (according to the numbers), but if they can broaden that torque curve and boost the amount available below 3000RPM, it will make the V-6 a more palatable option. Heck, it might even help fuel economy even more than the EPA numbers reflect since drivers won't feel the need to wring that little six pot's neck in order to get moving in a hurry.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2015, 12:39 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 153
Thanks: 6
Thanked 37 Times in 22 Posts
Rep Power: 1883
Nikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond reputeNikita has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Car & Driver article on the V6 says no DI for MY16

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technosavant View Post
DI cuts both ways. On one hand you have slightly better efficiency and power because of better control of the spray, on the other you have to come up with a way to deal with the carbon on the valves or resign yourself to regular cleaning bills. One automaker (I forget who) kept using injectors in the regular location with DI engines... a little shot of fuel from the port injectors every so often kept things clean. Or so I heard.

IMO, if the torque band can get broadened it will be a huge help...
Nicely expressed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-02-2015, 09:36 PM
Member
My Jeep: 2013 3.6L JK
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 81
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 1011
K1500Z71 is on a distinguished road
Re: Car & Driver article on the V6 says no DI for MY16

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technosavant View Post
DI cuts both ways. On one hand you have slightly better efficiency and power because of better control of the spray, on the other you have to come up with a way to deal with the carbon on the valves or resign yourself to regular cleaning bills. One automaker (I forget who) kept using injectors in the regular location with DI engines... a little shot of fuel from the port injectors every so often kept things clean. Or so I heard.

IMO, if the torque band can get broadened it will be a huge help. 260 lb-ft. only appearing at over 4000RPM was a major oversight for a vehicle like this. Mated to the Mercedes W5A580 transmission (2011-2012) it really meant the thing can be caught flat-footed pretty easily. The 8 speed really helped with this (according to the numbers), but if they can broaden that torque curve and boost the amount available below 3000RPM, it will make the V-6 a more palatable option. Heck, it might even help fuel economy even more than the EPA numbers reflect since drivers won't feel the need to wring that little six pot's neck in order to get moving in a hurry.

I believe it is the Toyota 3.5 V6 that uses both port and DI. Port injection apparently improves performance at low rpms also.


Sent from my iPhone using JeepGarage
__________________
'14 ML 350 Bluetec
'13 JK Sahara
'12 Denali HD Duramax
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-02-2015, 09:50 PM
Technosavant's Avatar
Premium Member
My Jeep: 2011 3.6L WK2
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: STL, MO area
Posts: 1,301
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 3711
Technosavant has a reputation beyond reputeTechnosavant has a reputation beyond reputeTechnosavant has a reputation beyond reputeTechnosavant has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Car & Driver article on the V6 says no DI for MY16

Quote:
Originally Posted by K1500Z71 View Post
I believe it is the Toyota 3.5 V6 that uses both port and DI. Port injection apparently improves performance at low rpms also.


Sent from my iPhone using JeepGarage
Could be. I wanted to say it was Toyota, I just didn't remember for sure and couldn't back it up with actual evidence.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CE light code says O2 sensor - dealer says coils? TheLoneWolf Troubleshooting/Problems 4 08-12-2013 06:04 AM
New Car and Driver Article SLVRLTNG Grand Cherokee SRT - WK2 7 03-19-2011 07:53 PM
Inside Line Article: 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee First Look seanster Grand Cherokee - WK2 - 18 05-27-2010 10:59 AM
Save Up to 50% off Shampoos (exp 5/12) & Ask A Pro Article - Safely Removing Pollen DetailedImage.com Detailed Image 1 05-11-2010 05:16 PM
Nice little article about 09 GCSRT8!!! SoCalMoparWK Grand Cherokee SRT8 - WK 9 11-11-2009 12:24 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2012 - JeepGarage.Org
The Jeep Grand Cherokee Owners Community

JeepGarage.org is in no way associated with or endorsed by FCA US LLC. Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Ram, Mopar and SRT are registered trademarks of FCA US LLC.