Since the GC ZF (FCA) shifter debate (ZF because they designed it), emerged a number of months ago and with all that went with that, I've always wanted to ask this question from the US members of this site and Milous with his post just now, has just made me want to ask it even more. (I may offend some members because it goes to the heart of how you learnt to drive).
My question is - Why is the Park Brake considered an Emergency brake (e-brake) and where did this concept come from?
How did a 'Park Brake' become an 'E (emergency) Brake' in the US? What even is an E-brake?
There is nowhere in any vehicle operators manual that I have owned, be that Holden, Subaru, Ford, Mazda or Jeep (both Austrian and US built), that the park brake is referred to as an Emergency Brake.
It is the Park Brake.
When you start going for your drivers licence in New Zealand or Australia, the Park Brake and what it is used for is hammered into you from the get-go. It is a natural reaction to probably 99.9% of all drivers down-under to apply the park brake when the vehicle is stopped and placed in P.
It is reiterated throughout all manufacturers operators manuals.
How did owners of vehicles driving in the US change this concept and more to point why? And Milous, I'm not having a go at you, but your very reference to it being an e-brake, tells me that the problem is well entrenched.
Putting a vehicle in Park and activating the Park brake is not an emergency situation. It's just what you do. It should never be referred to as an e-brake because it isn't.
It's the Park Brake. It doesn't matter whether you're on the flat or not - put the vehicle into Park and pull it with your hand, push it with your foot, or flick it up with your finger (my KL with it's electronic park brake) but put your park brake on. It's not an emergency - it's just parking.